Quickly discover the crash test results and score of the Skoda Kylaq ad XUV 3XO with the below-provided table:
| Parameters | Skoda Kylaq | Mahindra XUV 3XO |
|---|---|---|
| Adult Occupant Protection Score | 30.88/32 Points | 29.36/32 Points |
| Adult Safety Rating | 5 Stars | 5 Stars |
| Frontal Offset Deformable Barrier Test Score | 15.04/16 Points | 13.36/16 Points |
| Side Movable Deformable Barrier Test Score | 15.84 / 16 Points | 16/16 Points |
| COP Score | 45/49 Points | 43/49 Points |
| Child Safety Rating | 5 Stars | 5 Stars |
| Child Safety Score | 24/24 Points | 24/24 Points |
Individual Crash Test Performance details of both SUVs
Skoda Kylaq
In its frontal offset deformable barrier test, the Skoda Kylaq demonstrated "good" protection for every component of the co-driver. Except for the left tibia and chest, which were assessed as "adequate," every portion of the driver was protected to a "good" degree.
All of the driver's body parts received "good" ratings for protection in the side moveable deformable barrier test, except for the chest, which received "adequate" ratings. Nevertheless, the side pole impact test gave the dummy's protection to every part a "good" rating.
The dynamic score for the front and side protection of the 18-month-old and 3-year-old dummies in the Skoda Kylaq's COP testing was 8 out of 8 points and 4 out of 4 points, respectively.
Mahindra XUV 3XO
Only the driver's head, neck, pelvis, and thighs received "good" protection in the Mahindra XUV 3XO's frontal offset deformable barrier test, however, the co-driver's entire body received "good" protection. The right tibia was evaluated as having "poor" protection, whereas the chest, left tibia, and legs were deemed to have "adequate" protection.
Nevertheless, in the side moveable deformable barrier test and side pole impact test, the Mahindra sub-4m SUV's protection was evaluated as "good" for every portion of the dummy.
Final Takeaway
The Kylaq's frontal deformable barrier test gave the legs and right tibia "good" protection, while the XUV 3XO gave them "adequate" protection. Furthermore, the Kylaq's protection of the driver's left tibia was evaluated as "adequate," whilst the XUV 3XO's protection was rated as "marginal." Both of the sub-4m options' chest protection received the "adequate" rating in the test.
Nevertheless, the dummies in both cars were adequately protected throughout in the side pole impact test. In contrast, the XUV 3XO won the side movable deformable barrier test, providing "good" protection for every portion of the dummy. However, the Kylaq was evaluated as offering "adequate" protection for the dummy's chest. This explains why the Kylaq outscored the XUV 3XO by 1.52 points.
In terms of COP, the Skoda Kylaq outperforms its Mahindra competitor with 45 and 43 points, respectively, out of a possible 49. This is most likely because the Skoda sub-4m SUV scored more on the vehicle assessment—9 out of 13 points—than the Mahindra XUV 3XO, which only received 7.
Conclusion
Hence, if you are looking for a safe and compact SUV, these two are good options as these are certified as safe by the NCAP and these SUVs compete against the Maruti Brezza, Tata Nexon, Hyundai Venue, Kia Sonet, and even the Kia Syros.
Also Read: